post news

view news  latest news

view news analysis  latest news analysis

other news

archives

2005
Aug     Sep     Oct     Nov
Dec     

2006
Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr
May     Jun     Jul     Aug
Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec


2007
Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr
May     Jun     Jul     Aug
Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec


2008
Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr
May     Jun     Jul     Aug
Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec


2009
Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr
May     Jun     Jul     Aug
Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec


2010
Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr
May     

Raju

Blogging may attract libel & criminal cases   this news feed

Posted By Raju01 on 23 February 2009 22:55
Blogging may attract libel & criminal cases
SC Refuses To Protect Boy From Criminal Case
Dhananjay Mahapatra | TNN

A 19-year-old blogger’s case could forever change the ground rules of blogging. Bloggers may no longer express their uninhibited views on everything under the sun, for the Supreme Court said they may face libel and even prosecution for the blog content.

It will no longer be safe to start a blog and invite others to register their raunchy, caustic and even abusive comments on an issue while seeking protection behind the disclaimer — views put on the blog are that of the writers.

This chilling warning emerged as a Bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice P Sathasivam refused to protect a 19-year-old Kerala boy, who had started a community on Orkut against Shiv Sena, from protection against summons received from a Maharashtra court on a criminal case filed against him. Petitioner Ajith D had started a community on Orkut against Shiv Sena. In this community, there were several posts and discussions by anonymous persons who alleged that Shiv Sena was trying to divide the country on region and caste basis.

Reacting to the posts, the Sena youth wing’s state secretary registered a criminal complaint at Thane police station in August 2008 based on which FIR was lodged against Ajith under Sections 506 and 295A pertaining to hurting public sentiment.
After getting anticipatory bail from Kerala HC, Ajith moved the Supreme Court through counsel Jogy Scaria seeking quashing of the criminal complaint on the ground that the blog contents were restricted to communication within the community and did not have defamation value.

A computer science student, Ajith pleaded that the comments made on the blog were mere exercise of their fundamental right to freedom of expression. Unimpressed, the Bench said, “We cannot quash criminal proceedings. You are a computer student and you know how many people access internet portals. Hence, if someone files a criminal action on the basis of the content, then you will have to face the case.”

Add this news to:

Delicious   Technorati   Xdot   Furl   Yahoo_myweb   Digg   Google_bmarks   Blinklist   Windows_live   Yigg   Spurl   Reddit   Netscape   Tailrank   Newsvine   Stumbleupon   Magnolia  

Analysis